LOL: The controversy in the community caused by a new rune that will arrive next patch

League of Legends You will not receive updates until the end of March, but Riot Games is already working on the changes that will reach the game in the next patch. The developer wants to have everything ready before starting a series of meetings that could alter their work form and has presented a new rune that is already available in the PBE and the community has received with some controversy when considering a very bad idea.

New League of Legends Rune - Treasure Hunter

The polemic new rune of the next patch

The element in question receives the name of treasure hunter (Treasurehunter) and will be an option that will reach the branch of domination , standing as a secondary option in the fourth space. According to the version currently available on the test server, it would be incorporated into the game by replacing voraz , which is currently one of the most chosen by a large assortment of champions and offers an extra permanent omnisuction according to the Assists and casualties obtained into starting up to a total of 6% when we have eliminated or helped eliminate each enemy character.

The main criticism of the community to this new article is that it is a tremendously complicated addition to balance . Gold is a very important variable in League of Legends. In this way, if it contributes too little, it will hardly be used. However, it is enough that the numbers are a bit high for it to be an essential choice in most of the characters that use the domination branch. Something that does not just like the community.

The intention of Riot Games with this change could be to eliminate part of what developers call systemic healing. Hunter Voraz was used by a large number of characters and was especially popular among the shooters. However, League of Legends is directed to a future with recovery of life in which this article may not take place. Along with these changes, it is expected that the damage present in the game is also reduced.

Comments